Needless to say, I get paper dumped at the end of the term. This makes me tired and cranky, but gives the kids the chance they need. I know other teachers who strictly enforce due dates, and I've seen lots of kids take a zero because they couldn't get an assignment in on time. This seems to be really pointless. Unless of course the content of that assignment wasn't really important to begin with. If the work was essential for their progress, isn't it better to make sure they do it rather than enforce a time line? It's better for the student, but like I said it makes me cranky, not kick the dog cranky, that takes W, but cranky never the less. It also interferes with my ability to write anything worth while. I have a few blog posts I've been working on but can't seem to really tweak to the point I like them.
I'll try to get them up soon, especially the third part of the zombie zeitgeist.
Oh my gosh, me too. I try, I mean REALLY try, to enforce due dates, but I just can't look a kid in the eye and say either "Your work is worth nothing" or "Don't bother trying." I just can't do it.
ReplyDeleteThis year I gave up on due dates all together. Every eek they got either a 10 or a 5 out 0f 10 points as a weekly grade. If they handed everything by the due date that week they got a 10 if not a five and they could get me the work whenever. That way late work still had the full value regardless of hand in date.
ReplyDelete